The oracle of Omaha, Warren Buffett, was not too long ago included within the so-called “finance gerontocracy” by the co-founder of Paypal and Palantir, Peter Thiel, for sustaining an archaic and overly bearish stance on Bitcoin and different cryptocurrencies.
Nicely, Buffett has now struck again, not too long ago stating that he wouldn’t purchase Bitcoin at even a value of $25. Readers can watch the whole clip right here:
Because the confrontation round Bitcoin’s prospects continues, MicroStrategy (NASDAQ:MSTR) has now issued a warning that it will face a margin call on its sizable Bitcoin stake ought to the cryptocurrency’s value decline to $21,000. Keep in mind that the corporate at present owns round 129,218 Bitcoins acquired for $3.97 billion, or $30,700 per coin. Nonetheless, the margin name solely pertains to the $205 million Bitcoin-collateralized loan that MicroStrategy has taken from Silvergate financial institution, and within the occasion of a set off, the corporate would merely have to supply extra Bitcoins from its sizable unencumbered stake to take care of applicable mortgage collateral.
In fact, we had performed an intensive analysis on Bitcoin’s prospects over the weekend, noting that the cryptocurrency has now entered a broad space of help that prolonged all the way in which to $29,000. Buffeted by a extra conducive near-term on-chain metrics setup, we proceed to imagine that the likelihood of a breach of main proximal help zones stays slim, setting the stage for a large bounce.
Nonetheless, as we’ve repeatedly flagged over the previous few months, Bitcoin’s ever-growing correlation with US shares normally and high-beta, growth-heavy equities, specifically, is a significant explanation for concern. Take into account the truth that Bitcoin’s 60-day correlation with the S&P 500 index is at present at 0.70 (coinmetrics), indicating that round 70 % of the cryptocurrency’s strikes replicate these of the S&P 500 index.
This can be a main menace to Bitcoin’s narrative of being a novel asset that doesn’t fall inside the realm of conventional finance. Furthermore, by failing to carry its head over the proverbial waters amid the present macroeconomic surroundings characterised by a fierce inflationary impulse, Bitcoin has additionally demonstrated that it could’t operate as a viable inflation hedge, at current a minimum of.
So, why has this correlation regime been so persistent? Nicely, institutional adoption is a double-edged sword. On the one hand, as increasingly more establishments dabble in Bitcoin, the cryptocurrency advantages from elevated liquidity, which ought to dampen its legendary volatility.

Supply: https://www.vaneck.com/us/en/blogs/gold-investing/revisiting-gold-and-bitcoin-as-commodities-rally/bitcoin-and-gold-friends-or-foes.pdf
Actually, as per a current report by VanEck, the institutional adoption of Bitcoin has by no means been extra vibrant than in 2022, when thus far this 12 months, almost 160 separate 13F filings by varied hedge funds have referenced their Bitcoin holdings.
This onslaught of latest liquidity is having a noticeable impression on Bitcoin’s volatility. For example, the present Bitcoin value of $33,092.5 corresponds to a peak-to-trough decline of 51.19 % thus far, which is considerably lower than the standard bear market drawdown of over 80 %. In fact, the present bearish cycle is way from over, and it stays to be seen whether or not Bitcoin can stave off a extra typical drawdown within the present cycle on the again of extra liquidity from institutional traders. Even when Bitcoin’s value bottoms on the $21,000 value stage, it will nonetheless correspond to a peak-to-trough decline of 69 %, nicely in need of the standard 80-percent-plus drawdowns.

Supply: https://www.vaneck.com/us/en/blogs/gold-investing/revisiting-gold-and-bitcoin-as-commodities-rally/bitcoin-and-gold-friends-or-foes.pdf
The graph above, sourced from the VanEck report, clearly exhibits how the cryptocurrency’s relative volatility has fallen in relation to the Nasdaq 100 index (as of the twenty sixth of January 2022).
So, whereas institutional traders are bringing extra liquidity to the desk that’s enjoying an vital position in tamping down Bitcoin’s legendary volatility, the draw back comes from the elevated correlation of the cryptocurrency with different conventional monetary belongings, significantly high-beta US shares.
The rationale right here is easy. Institutional traders are at present lumping Bitcoin with different high-risk belongings, resulting in comparable liquidation waves and hovering correlation.
We had famous over the weekend how the Federal Reserve was making an attempt to hammer danger belongings as a way to curb the wealth impact pervading the US financial system, thereby hoping to subdue shopper spending and funky down the present red-hot inflationary impulse. So long as this paradigm continues, US equities will be unable to get well, leading to waves of institutional promoting that will proceed to increase to Bitcoin, given their supposedly comparable danger profiles.
It’s a certainty in finance that traits by no means final. Consequently, we do imagine that the prevailing hellish regime for Bitcoin will ultimately finish, both on account of the inflationary impulse dying down or institutional adoption of the cryptocurrency reaching a essential mass that then frees the cryptocurrency from the clutches of the prevailing excessive correlation regime with US equities.
Warren Buffett thinks Bitcoin is just not even value $25. Peter Thiel, however, believes it’s value a minimum of $4 million. Given Buffett’s historic aversion to something associated to tech – in spite of everything, he solely purchased Apple again in 2016 after its ascendancy had been confirmed past doubt – we might take Buffett’s outrageous prediction with a tiny grain of salt.